Privacy     Legal     Contact

RAU Awards Institute (TM)
skip menu

Valid HTML 4.01!

Level A conformance icon,

Ethics

Every webmaster of an awards program will eventually have to deal with some type of ethical issue. For example:

A good friend wants you to evaluate his/her web site, and you're concerned about being objective -- especially when you discover that his/her site doesn't meet your criteria;

Someone with whom you have just had a huge argument applies for your award;

A ghastly, horrible-looking site qualifies for your highest award;

A great site that you really want to award violates one of your criteria and should be disqualified;

You find your award posted on a site that never applied for your award;

The webmaster of a site you disqualified sends you an obscenity-filled email;

You find that another awards program has copied your criteria word-for-word.

It's a good idea to do a little thinking about how you will deal with ethical issues before they happen.

Simply stated, ethical behavior in an awards program means fair treatment of everyone who applies for your award.  Everyone.  You use the same rules for every applicant.  If they meet your criteria, they win your award.  If they don't meet the criteria, no award.  There should be no "hidden" or "secret" requirements that are necessary in order to win your award.  (If your criteria is specific enough, you can eliminate a lot of problems in this area.)  If the ghastly site qualifies for your award, you give them the award.  (That doesn't mean you can't change your criteria for the future!)

Although it's certainly not required, many awards programs choose to post a Code of Ethics or Statement of Ethics on their awards program site.  The idea is to remove any doubt that the applicant may have concerning fair treatment.  Some webmasters write their own ethics statement; others copy a public-domain ethics statement and adapt it to their particular program.  (The statement originally written by Rhonda Serong, available in the Other Resources section, is probably the most widely-used statement of this type, but there are others available.)

You may wish to consider joining an awards ethics organization.  These are organizations especially for webmasters of awards programs.  They may offer public-domain ethics statements, available help for awards evaluations and mediation services for disputes.  Typically, the membership has a lot of experience in dealing with ethical issues, and they can offer you some guidance.  It costs nothing to join these organizations.  Check the Resources area for some of these associations.


 

AWARDS THEORY MENU: Before You Begin . Purpose . Award Type . Award Design . Criteria . Privacy Policy . Ethics . Ratings

MAIN MENU: Home . What's New . Awards Theory . Web Site Theory . Other Resources . Articles . Support RAU . About RAU . Privacy . Legal . Contact

 

All content copyright � 2004-2006 by RAU Awards Institute� (except where otherwise indicated).  All rights reserved.